ACXP vs ADMA

Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs ADMA Biologics Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

ACXP

Biotechnology
Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Quality
3.8
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$1.99
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

ADMA

Biotechnology
ADMA Biologics Inc
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$7.93
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ACXP Fair ValueACXP Upside ADMA Fair ValueADMA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.71 -14.0% $1.30 -83.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.87 -26.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.12 -94.7% $8.09 +2.0%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ACXP vs ADMA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ACXP vs ADMA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ADMA scores higher with a 9.1/10 quality rating vs ACXP's 3.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ACXP) and ADMA Biologics Inc (ADMA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ACXP currently trades at $1.99 with a QOC of 3.8/10, while ADMA trades at $7.93 with a QOC of 9.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).