ACTG vs EBF

Acacia Research Corporation vs Ennis, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ACTG

Business Equipment & Supplies
Acacia Research Corporation
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$4.70
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

EBF

Business Equipment & Supplies
Ennis, Inc.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$20.54
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ACTG Fair ValueACTG Upside EBF Fair ValueEBF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $13.86 +195.0% $17.11 -16.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.51 -67.9% $13.70 -33.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ACTG vs EBF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ACTG vs EBF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EBF scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs ACTG's 8.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) and Ennis, Inc. (EBF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ACTG currently trades at $4.70 with a QOC of 8.2/10, while EBF trades at $20.54 with a QOC of 8.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).