ACGL vs AEG

Arch Capital Group Ltd. vs Aegon Ltd. New York Registry Sh — Valuation Comparison 2026

ACGL

Insurance - Diversified
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$90.67
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

AEG

Insurance - Diversified
Aegon Ltd. New York Registry Sh
Quality
1.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$8.43
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ACGL Fair ValueACGL Upside AEG Fair ValueAEG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $171.45 +89.1% $2.81 -66.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $169.79 +87.3% $3.63 -54.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ACGL vs AEG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ACGL vs AEG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ACGL scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs AEG's 1.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) and Aegon Ltd. New York Registry Sh (AEG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ACGL currently trades at $90.67 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while AEG trades at $8.43 with a QOC of 1.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).