ABT vs AEMD

Abbott Laboratories vs Aethlon Medical, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ABT

Medical Devices
Abbott Laboratories
Quality
9.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$85.60
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

AEMD

Medical Devices
Aethlon Medical, Inc.
Quality
4.6
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$2.21
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ABT Fair ValueABT Upside AEMD Fair ValueAEMD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $63.50 -25.8% $2.86 +29.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $8.66 -89.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $46.04 -46.2% $0.40 -82.8%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ABT vs AEMD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ABT vs AEMD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ABT scores higher with a 9.9/10 quality rating vs AEMD's 4.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Aethlon Medical, Inc. (AEMD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ABT currently trades at $85.60 with a QOC of 9.9/10, while AEMD trades at $2.21 with a QOC of 4.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).