ABG vs AZI

Asbury Automotive Group Inc vs Autozi Internet Technology (Glo — Valuation Comparison 2026

ABG

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Asbury Automotive Group Inc
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
19
SAFE
Price
$194.75
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

AZI

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Autozi Internet Technology (Glo
Quality
2.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.21
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ABG Fair ValueABG Upside AZI Fair ValueAZI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $614.45 +215.5% $0.24 -81.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $101.03 -48.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $529.92 +172.1% $4.33 +230.3%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ABG vs AZI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ABG vs AZI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ABG scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs AZI's 2.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Asbury Automotive Group Inc (ABG) and Autozi Internet Technology (Glo (AZI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ABG currently trades at $194.75 with a QOC of 8.5/10, while AZI trades at $1.21 with a QOC of 2.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).