ABBV vs GILD

AbbVie Inc. vs Gilead Sciences, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ABBV

Drug Manufacturers - General
AbbVie Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
13
SAFE
Price
$218.63
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

GILD

Drug Manufacturers - General
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$136.22
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ABBV Fair ValueABBV Upside GILD Fair ValueGILD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $204.40 -6.5% $76.74 -43.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $8.92 -95.9% $65.99 -51.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ABBV vs GILD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ABBV vs GILD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GILD scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs ABBV's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ABBV currently trades at $218.63 with a QOC of 7.7/10, while GILD trades at $136.22 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).