WTW vs YB

Willis Towers Watson Public Lim vs Yuanbao Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

WTW

Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service
Willis Towers Watson Public Lim
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$249.67
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

YB

Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service
Yuanbao Inc.
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$14.85
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType WTW Fair ValueWTW Upside YB Fair ValueYB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $55.20 -77.9% $48.60 +227.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $80.25 -67.9% $34.17 +130.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for WTW vs YB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

WTW vs YB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

YB scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs WTW's 5.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Willis Towers Watson Public Lim (WTW) and Yuanbao Inc. (YB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

WTW currently trades at $249.67 with a QOC of 5.3/10, while YB trades at $14.85 with a QOC of 8.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).