WGS vs XGN

GeneDx Holdings Corp. vs Exagen Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

WGS

Diagnostics & Research
GeneDx Holdings Corp.
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$50.15
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

XGN

Diagnostics & Research
Exagen Inc.
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$5.08
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType WGS Fair ValueWGS Upside XGN Fair ValueXGN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $7.40 -85.2% $1.40 -72.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.79 -95.7% $4.38 +43.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for WGS vs XGN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

WGS vs XGN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

XGN scores higher with a 6.3/10 quality rating vs WGS's 6.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Exagen Inc. (XGN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

WGS currently trades at $50.15 with a QOC of 6.0/10, while XGN trades at $5.08 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).