WAY vs WEAV

Waystar Holding Corp. vs Weave Communications, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

WAY

Health Information Services
Waystar Holding Corp.
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$19.39
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

WEAV

Health Information Services
Weave Communications, Inc.
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
49
WARN
Price
$5.76
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType WAY Fair ValueWAY Upside WEAV Fair ValueWEAV Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $24.88 +28.3% $1.17 -79.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $8.48 -56.2% $7.38 +28.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for WAY vs WEAV — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

WAY vs WEAV — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WAY scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs WEAV's 6.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Waystar Holding Corp. (WAY) and Weave Communications, Inc. (WEAV) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

WAY currently trades at $19.39 with a QOC of 8.9/10, while WEAV trades at $5.76 with a QOC of 6.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).