Is WAT or WGS more undervalued in 2026?

CirclFi compares Waters Corporation (WAT) and GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) using 13 institutional-grade valuation models. WAT has a Quality of Company score of 5.7/10 while WGS scores 6.0/10.

Which is a better buy — WAT or WGS?

Compare intrinsic values from 13 independent models against current market prices. CirclFi also calculates Value Trap scores. This is not financial advice — conduct your own analysis.

How do WAT and WGS valuations compare?

WAT at $366.67 and WGS at $50.15 are compared across Bayesian DCF, EPV, EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, and 8 additional models.

WAT vs WGS Valuation Comparison 2026 — Intrinsic Value Analysis

WAT

Diagnostics & Research

Waters Corporation

Quality

5.7

out of 10

Value Trap

SAFE

Price

$366.67

Last close

Models

12/13

Active

WGS

Diagnostics & Research

GeneDx Holdings Corp.

Quality

6.0

out of 10

Value Trap

SAFE

Price

$50.15

Last close

Models

12/13

Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

Model	Type	WAT Fair Value	WAT Upside	WGS Fair Value	WGS Upside
Bayesian DCF	Intrinsic	$15.32	-95.8%	$7.40	-85.2%
Earnings Power Value	Intrinsic	$36.66	-89.7%	$2.79	-95.7%
EROIC Spread	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
First Chicago	Scenario	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Markov DDM	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
ML-RIV	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Dynamic NAV	Asset-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
PWERM	Option-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Sentiment SOTP	Hybrid	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
CUCE Ensemble	Ensemble	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
FTNN Topology	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
RCMH-DCF	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%

🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for WAT vs WGS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

WAT vs WGS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WGS scores higher with a 6.0/10 quality rating vs WAT's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Waters Corporation (WAT) and GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

WAT currently trades at $366.67 with a QOC of 5.7/10, while WGS trades at $50.15 with a QOC of 6.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).