VSA vs YQ

VisionSys AI Inc. vs 17 Education & Technology Group — Valuation Comparison 2026

VSA

Education & Training Services
VisionSys AI Inc.
Quality
4.9
out of 10
Value Trap
54
WARN
Price
$3.72
Last close
Models
4/13
Active
VS

YQ

Education & Training Services
17 Education & Technology Group
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$2.48
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType VSA Fair ValueVSA Upside YQ Fair ValueYQ Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.06 -71.6% $9.52 +284.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.36 +78.2% $0.13 -93.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for VSA vs YQ — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

VSA vs YQ — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

YQ scores higher with a 6.6/10 quality rating vs VSA's 4.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing VisionSys AI Inc. (VSA) and 17 Education & Technology Group (YQ) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

VSA currently trades at $3.72 with a QOC of 4.9/10, while YQ trades at $2.48 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).