VRTS vs WHF

Virtus Investment Partners, Inc vs WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

VRTS

Asset Management
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
38
LOW
Price
$142.15
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

WHF

Asset Management
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
10
SAFE
Price
$6.70
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType VRTS Fair ValueVRTS Upside WHF Fair ValueWHF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $545.18 +283.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $217.71 +53.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $479.49 +237.3% $2.83 -60.0%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $19.02 +183.9%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for VRTS vs WHF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

VRTS vs WHF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

VRTS scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs WHF's 6.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Virtus Investment Partners, Inc (VRTS) and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

VRTS currently trades at $142.15 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while WHF trades at $6.70 with a QOC of 6.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).