VLT vs VRTS

Invesco High Income Trust II vs Virtus Investment Partners, Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

VLT

Asset Management
Invesco High Income Trust II
Quality
1.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$10.52
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

VRTS

Asset Management
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
38
LOW
Price
$142.15
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType VLT Fair ValueVLT Upside VRTS Fair ValueVRTS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.78 -73.5% $545.18 +283.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $217.71 +53.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $15.14 +43.9%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for VLT vs VRTS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

VLT vs VRTS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

VRTS scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs VLT's 1.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc (VRTS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

VLT currently trades at $10.52 with a QOC of 1.9/10, while VRTS trades at $142.15 with a QOC of 8.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).