VINP vs VRTS

Vinci Compass Investments Ltd. vs Virtus Investment Partners, Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

VINP

Investment Advice
Vinci Compass Investments Ltd.
Quality
6.7
out of 10
Value Trap
51
WARN
Price
$10.13
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

VRTS

Investment Advice
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
38
LOW
Price
$143.03
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType VINP Fair ValueVINP Upside VRTS Fair ValueVRTS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $8.71 -14.1% $526.42 +268.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $217.27 +51.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $2.72 -73.2% $112.52 -21.3%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for VINP vs VRTS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

VINP vs VRTS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

VRTS scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs VINP's 6.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Vinci Compass Investments Ltd. (VINP) and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc (VRTS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

VINP currently trades at $10.13 with a QOC of 6.7/10, while VRTS trades at $143.03 with a QOC of 8.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).