VICR vs VRT

Vicor Corporation vs Vertiv Holdings, LLC — Valuation Comparison 2026

VICR

Electronic Components, NEC
Vicor Corporation
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$334.84
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

VRT

Electronic Components, NEC
Vertiv Holdings, LLC
Quality
9.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$315.71
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType VICR Fair ValueVICR Upside VRT Fair ValueVRT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $51.73 -84.6% $32.69 -89.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $32.67 -90.2% $32.79 -89.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for VICR vs VRT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

VICR vs VRT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

VRT scores higher with a 9.9/10 quality rating vs VICR's 7.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Vicor Corporation (VICR) and Vertiv Holdings, LLC (VRT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

VICR currently trades at $334.84 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while VRT trades at $315.71 with a QOC of 9.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).