VIAV vs VISN

Viavi Solutions Inc. vs Vistance Networks, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

VIAV

Communication Equipment
Viavi Solutions Inc.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$48.49
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

VISN

Communication Equipment
Vistance Networks, Inc.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$12.37
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType VIAV Fair ValueVIAV Upside VISN Fair ValueVISN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.70 -92.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.35 -95.8% $27.97 +134.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $0.43 -99.1% $10.70 -44.9%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for VIAV vs VISN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

VIAV vs VISN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

VISN scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs VIAV's 6.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) and Vistance Networks, Inc. (VISN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

VIAV currently trades at $48.49 with a QOC of 6.6/10, while VISN trades at $12.37 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).