VGNT vs WKSP

Versigent PLC vs Worksport, Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

VGNT

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
Versigent PLC
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$44.12
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

WKSP

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
Worksport, Ltd.
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$0.73
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType VGNT Fair ValueVGNT Upside WKSP Fair ValueWKSP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $12.35 -72.0% $0.17 -77.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $15.21 -56.5% $1.57 +44.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for VGNT vs WKSP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

VGNT vs WKSP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WKSP scores higher with a 5.7/10 quality rating vs VGNT's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Versigent PLC (VGNT) and Worksport, Ltd. (WKSP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

VGNT currently trades at $44.12 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while WKSP trades at $0.73 with a QOC of 5.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).