UTSI vs WATT

UTStarcom Holdings Corp vs Energous Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

UTSI

Communication Equipment
UTStarcom Holdings Corp
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$2.73
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

WATT

Communication Equipment
Energous Corporation
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
39
LOW
Price
$27.45
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType UTSI Fair ValueUTSI Upside WATT Fair ValueWATT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $8.30 +203.9% $10.20 -62.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.05 +74.2% $9.35 -72.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for UTSI vs WATT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

UTSI vs WATT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WATT scores higher with a 6.6/10 quality rating vs UTSI's 6.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing UTStarcom Holdings Corp (UTSI) and Energous Corporation (WATT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

UTSI currently trades at $2.73 with a QOC of 6.0/10, while WATT trades at $27.45 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).