TXG vs WAT

10x Genomics, Inc. vs Waters Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

TXG

Laboratory Analytical Instruments
10x Genomics, Inc.
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$28.30
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

WAT

Laboratory Analytical Instruments
Waters Corporation
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$383.57
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType TXG Fair ValueTXG Upside WAT Fair ValueWAT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $21.24 -25.0% $15.47 -96.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.32 -81.2% $36.66 -89.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for TXG vs WAT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

TXG vs WAT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TXG scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs WAT's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing 10x Genomics, Inc. (TXG) and Waters Corporation (WAT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

TXG currently trades at $28.30 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while WAT trades at $383.57 with a QOC of 5.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).