TWST vs VIR

Twist Bioscience Corporation vs Vir Biotechnology, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

TWST

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Twist Bioscience Corporation
Quality
4.5
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$66.87
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

VIR

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Vir Biotechnology, Inc.
Quality
7.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$9.54
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType TWST Fair ValueTWST Upside VIR Fair ValueVIR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $16.85 -74.8% $2.47 -74.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $29.92 -50.9% $5.74 -42.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for TWST vs VIR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

TWST vs VIR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

VIR scores higher with a 7.0/10 quality rating vs TWST's 4.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Twist Bioscience Corporation (TWST) and Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

TWST currently trades at $66.87 with a QOC of 4.5/10, while VIR trades at $9.54 with a QOC of 7.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).