TSAT vs VIAV

Telesat Corporation vs Viavi Solutions Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

TSAT

Communication Equipment
Telesat Corporation
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$58.51
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

VIAV

Communication Equipment
Viavi Solutions Inc.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$48.49
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType TSAT Fair ValueTSAT Upside VIAV Fair ValueVIAV Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $17.27 -70.5% $3.70 -92.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.35 -95.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $44.34 -14.5% $1.38 -97.2%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for TSAT vs VIAV — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

TSAT vs VIAV — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

VIAV scores higher with a 6.6/10 quality rating vs TSAT's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Telesat Corporation (TSAT) and Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

TSAT currently trades at $58.51 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while VIAV trades at $48.49 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).