TROW vs TY

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. vs Tri Continental Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

TROW

Asset Management
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$103.55
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

TY

Asset Management
Tri Continental Corporation
Quality
1.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$35.18
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType TROW Fair ValueTROW Upside TY Fair ValueTY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $136.34 +31.7% $9.31 -73.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $98.31 -5.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $248.34 +139.8% $94.49 +168.6%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for TROW vs TY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

TROW vs TY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TROW scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs TY's 1.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) and Tri Continental Corporation (TY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

TROW currently trades at $103.55 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while TY trades at $35.18 with a QOC of 1.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).