TLIH vs WCC

Ten-League International Holdin vs WESCO International, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

TLIH

Industrial Distribution
Ten-League International Holdin
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$3.74
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

WCC

Industrial Distribution
WESCO International, Inc.
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$364.32
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType TLIH Fair ValueTLIH Upside WCC Fair ValueWCC Upside
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $8.19 +119.0% $16.15 -95.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $7.15 +91.3% $80.97 -77.8%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $1.48 -60.6%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for TLIH vs WCC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

TLIH vs WCC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WCC scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs TLIH's 7.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ten-League International Holdin (TLIH) and WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

TLIH currently trades at $3.74 with a QOC of 7.3/10, while WCC trades at $364.32 with a QOC of 8.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).