TK vs ZIM

Teekay Corporation Ltd. vs ZIM Integrated Shipping Service — Valuation Comparison 2026

TK

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Teekay Corporation Ltd.
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.47
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

ZIM

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
ZIM Integrated Shipping Service
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$23.49
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType TK Fair ValueTK Upside ZIM Fair ValueZIM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.82 -58.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.87 -78.9% $17.30 -26.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $4.21 -63.3% $3.04 -88.4%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for TK vs ZIM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

TK vs ZIM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ZIM scores higher with a 8.0/10 quality rating vs TK's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Teekay Corporation Ltd. (TK) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Service (ZIM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

TK currently trades at $11.47 with a QOC of 2.5/10, while ZIM trades at $23.49 with a QOC of 8.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).