SYBT vs TCBIO

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. vs Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SYBT

Banks - Regional
Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$71.31
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

TCBIO

Banks - Regional
Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$21.27
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SYBT Fair ValueSYBT Upside TCBIO Fair ValueTCBIO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $8.48 -88.1% $66.78 +214.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $39.92 -44.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $12.07 -83.1% $45.58 +111.2%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SYBT vs TCBIO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SYBT vs TCBIO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TCBIO scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs SYBT's 6.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. (SYBT) and Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (TCBIO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SYBT currently trades at $71.31 with a QOC of 6.5/10, while TCBIO trades at $21.27 with a QOC of 8.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).