SXT vs TANH

Sensient Technologies Corporati vs Tantech Holdings Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SXT

Industrial Organic Chemicals
Sensient Technologies Corporati
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$113.85
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

TANH

Industrial Organic Chemicals
Tantech Holdings Ltd.
Quality
1.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.43
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SXT Fair ValueSXT Upside TANH Fair ValueTANH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.36 -94.4% $0.09 -79.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.13 -91.1% $0.59 +62.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SXT vs TANH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SXT vs TANH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SXT scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs TANH's 1.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Sensient Technologies Corporati (SXT) and Tantech Holdings Ltd. (TANH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SXT currently trades at $113.85 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while TANH trades at $0.43 with a QOC of 1.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).