SUMA vs SVIV

SUMA Acquisition Corporation vs Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SUMA

Blank Checks
SUMA Acquisition Corporation
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$9.86
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

SVIV

Blank Checks
Spring Valley Acquisition Corp.
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$10.10
Last close
Models
7/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SUMA Fair ValueSUMA Upside SVIV Fair ValueSVIV Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.60 -73.6% $2.65 -73.8%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $9.20 -6.6% $9.38 -7.2%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SUMA vs SVIV — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SUMA vs SVIV — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

Both SUMA and SVIV score 1.7/10 on quality. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing SUMA Acquisition Corporation (SUMA) and Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. (SVIV) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SUMA currently trades at $9.86 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while SVIV trades at $10.10 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).