STRO vs TARS

Sutro Biopharma, Inc. vs Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

STRO

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Sutro Biopharma, Inc.
Quality
5.6
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$29.23
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

TARS

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$59.40
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType STRO Fair ValueSTRO Upside TARS Fair ValueTARS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $8.37 -71.4% $13.82 -76.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $27.01 -56.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $4.73 -83.8% $5.52 -90.7%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for STRO vs TARS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

STRO vs TARS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TARS scores higher with a 6.2/10 quality rating vs STRO's 5.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Sutro Biopharma, Inc. (STRO) and Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

STRO currently trades at $29.23 with a QOC of 5.6/10, while TARS trades at $59.40 with a QOC of 6.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).