STAA vs WRBY

STAAR Surgical Company vs Warby Parker Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

STAA

Ophthalmic Goods
STAAR Surgical Company
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$29.89
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

WRBY

Ophthalmic Goods
Warby Parker Inc.
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$24.52
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType STAA Fair ValueSTAA Upside WRBY Fair ValueWRBY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.33 -88.9% $7.35 -70.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.35 -80.3% $1.40 -94.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for STAA vs WRBY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

STAA vs WRBY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WRBY scores higher with a 7.8/10 quality rating vs STAA's 7.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) and Warby Parker Inc. (WRBY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

STAA currently trades at $29.89 with a QOC of 7.2/10, while WRBY trades at $24.52 with a QOC of 7.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).