SMP vs VC

Standard Motor Products, Inc. vs Visteon Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

SMP

Auto Parts
Standard Motor Products, Inc.
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$40.59
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

VC

Auto Parts
Visteon Corporation
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$119.12
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SMP Fair ValueSMP Upside VC Fair ValueVC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.04 -97.3% $174.52 +46.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $20.14 -50.4% $64.93 -45.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SMP vs VC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SMP vs VC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SMP scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs VC's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Standard Motor Products, Inc. (SMP) and Visteon Corporation (VC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SMP currently trades at $40.59 with a QOC of 7.9/10, while VC trades at $119.12 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).