SMHI vs STNG

SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. vs Scorpio Tankers Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SMHI

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc.
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$7.55
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

STNG

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$74.51
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SMHI Fair ValueSMHI Upside STNG Fair ValueSTNG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $101.57 +36.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $97.87 +31.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $31.12 +312.2% $91.32 +22.6%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $1.80 -76.1% $40.71 -45.4%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SMHI vs STNG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SMHI vs STNG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

STNG scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs SMHI's 6.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (SMHI) and Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SMHI currently trades at $7.55 with a QOC of 6.1/10, while STNG trades at $74.51 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).