SLP vs TALK

Simulations Plus, Inc. vs Talkspace, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SLP

Health Information Services
Simulations Plus, Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
31
LOW
Price
$16.71
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

TALK

Health Information Services
Talkspace, Inc.
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$5.19
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SLP Fair ValueSLP Upside TALK Fair ValueTALK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $14.43 -13.6% $1.48 -71.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $36.54 +118.6% $0.29 -94.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SLP vs TALK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SLP vs TALK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SLP scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs TALK's 7.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) and Talkspace, Inc. (TALK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SLP currently trades at $16.71 with a QOC of 7.7/10, while TALK trades at $5.19 with a QOC of 7.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).