SLDP vs STI

Solid Power, Inc. vs Solidion Technology, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SLDP

Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies
Solid Power, Inc.
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$3.31
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

STI

Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies
Solidion Technology, Inc.
Quality
4.4
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$4.65
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SLDP Fair ValueSLDP Upside STI Fair ValueSTI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.82 -75.2% $1.27 -72.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $12.37 +178.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $1.48 -55.2%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SLDP vs STI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SLDP vs STI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SLDP scores higher with a 5.7/10 quality rating vs STI's 4.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) and Solidion Technology, Inc. (STI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SLDP currently trades at $3.31 with a QOC of 5.7/10, while STI trades at $4.65 with a QOC of 4.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).