SHIP vs SMHI

Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp vs SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SHIP

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp
Quality
2.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$15.50
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SMHI

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc.
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$7.55
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SHIP Fair ValueSHIP Upside SMHI Fair ValueSMHI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.18 -79.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.73 -63.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $33.80 +110.2% $31.12 +312.2%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $6.66 -57.0% $1.80 -76.1%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SHIP vs SMHI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SHIP vs SMHI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SMHI scores higher with a 6.1/10 quality rating vs SHIP's 2.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp (SHIP) and SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (SMHI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SHIP currently trades at $15.50 with a QOC of 2.1/10, while SMHI trades at $7.55 with a QOC of 6.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).