SBSW vs SCZM

D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater Limite vs Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SBSW

Gold and Silver Ores
D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater Limite
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.93
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

SCZM

Gold and Silver Ores
Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$8.15
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SBSW Fair ValueSBSW Upside SCZM Fair ValueSCZM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $7.09 -40.5% $2.18 -73.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $2.49 -79.1% $7.18 -12.8%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $15.31 +20.4% $3.52 -57.3%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SBSW vs SCZM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SBSW vs SCZM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SBSW scores higher with a 6.1/10 quality rating vs SCZM's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater Limite (SBSW) and Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (SCZM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SBSW currently trades at $11.93 with a QOC of 6.1/10, while SCZM trades at $8.15 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).