SBRA vs SILA

Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. vs Sila Realty Trust, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SBRA

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$19.89
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

SILA

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Sila Realty Trust, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$30.24
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SBRA Fair ValueSBRA Upside SILA Fair ValueSILA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.17 -74.0% $31.54 +4.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.64 -81.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $5.89 -70.4% $16.77 -44.5%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SBRA vs SILA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SBRA vs SILA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SILA scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs SBRA's 8.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. (SBRA) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SBRA currently trades at $19.89 with a QOC of 8.2/10, while SILA trades at $30.24 with a QOC of 8.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).