SBET vs SLNH

SharpLink, Inc. vs Soluna Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SBET

Finance Services
SharpLink, Inc.
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$6.11
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

SLNH

Finance Services
Soluna Holdings, Inc.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$1.70
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SBET Fair ValueSBET Upside SLNH Fair ValueSLNH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.30 -78.7% $0.45 -73.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.29 +171.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $4.67 -23.6% $0.17 -90.0%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SBET vs SLNH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SBET vs SLNH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SLNH scores higher with a 5.9/10 quality rating vs SBET's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing SharpLink, Inc. (SBET) and Soluna Holdings, Inc. (SLNH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SBET currently trades at $6.11 with a QOC of 5.5/10, while SLNH trades at $1.70 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).