RYAN vs WDH

Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. vs Waterdrop Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

RYAN

Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service
Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.
Quality
7.5
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$31.85
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

WDH

Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service
Waterdrop Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$1.53
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RYAN Fair ValueRYAN Upside WDH Fair ValueWDH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $24.76 -22.3% $1.74 +13.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.62 +6.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $12.12 -62.9% $2.19 +43.4%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RYAN vs WDH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RYAN vs WDH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WDH scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs RYAN's 7.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. (RYAN) and Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RYAN currently trades at $31.85 with a QOC of 7.5/10, while WDH trades at $1.53 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).