RVT vs SABA

Royce Value Trust, Inc. vs 43676 — Valuation Comparison 2026

RVT

Asset Management
Royce Value Trust, Inc.
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$18.62
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

SABA

Asset Management
43676
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$8.58
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RVT Fair ValueRVT Upside SABA Fair ValueSABA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.50 -70.5% $2.27 -73.5%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $16.91 -8.7% $7.71 -9.8%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RVT vs SABA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RVT vs SABA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

Both RVT and SABA score 1.7/10 on quality. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Royce Value Trust, Inc. (RVT) and 43676 (SABA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RVT currently trades at $18.62 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while SABA trades at $8.58 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).