RVI vs SABA

Robinhood Ventures Fund I vs 43676 — Valuation Comparison 2026

RVI

Asset Management
Robinhood Ventures Fund I
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$50.00
Last close
Models
5/13
Active
VS

SABA

Asset Management
43676
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$8.58
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RVI Fair ValueRVI Upside SABA Fair ValueSABA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $13.24 -73.5% $2.27 -73.5%
First Chicago Scenario $71.22 +23.1% $10.30 +23.1%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $7.71 -9.8%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RVI vs SABA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RVI vs SABA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

Both RVI and SABA score 1.7/10 on quality. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Robinhood Ventures Fund I (RVI) and 43676 (SABA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RVI currently trades at $50.00 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while SABA trades at $8.58 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).