RUSHA vs UCAR

Rush Enterprises, Inc. vs U Power Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

RUSHA

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$71.01
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

UCAR

Auto & Truck Dealerships
U Power Limited
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$1.45
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RUSHA Fair ValueRUSHA Upside UCAR Fair ValueUCAR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $36.44 -48.7% $0.34 -76.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $19.31 -72.8% $2.02 +19.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RUSHA vs UCAR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RUSHA vs UCAR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RUSHA scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs UCAR's 6.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) and U Power Limited (UCAR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RUSHA currently trades at $71.01 with a QOC of 9.3/10, while UCAR trades at $1.45 with a QOC of 6.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).