ROMA vs SBC

Roma Green Finance Limited vs SBC Medical Group Holdings Inco — Valuation Comparison 2026

ROMA

Consulting Services
Roma Green Finance Limited
Quality
5.4
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$6.99
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

SBC

Consulting Services
SBC Medical Group Holdings Inco
Quality
7.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$3.19
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ROMA Fair ValueROMA Upside SBC Fair ValueSBC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.22 -53.9% $2.79 -12.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.42 -93.1% $4.75 +48.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ROMA vs SBC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ROMA vs SBC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SBC scores higher with a 7.0/10 quality rating vs ROMA's 5.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Roma Green Finance Limited (ROMA) and SBC Medical Group Holdings Inco (SBC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ROMA currently trades at $6.99 with a QOC of 5.4/10, while SBC trades at $3.19 with a QOC of 7.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).