RLGT vs SGLY

Radiant Logistics, Inc. vs Singularity Future Technology L — Valuation Comparison 2026

RLGT

Arrangement of Transportation of Freight & Cargo
Radiant Logistics, Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
11
SAFE
Price
$8.49
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

SGLY

Arrangement of Transportation of Freight & Cargo
Singularity Future Technology L
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$0.39
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RLGT Fair ValueRLGT Upside SGLY Fair ValueSGLY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.49 -23.5% $0.38 -2.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.45 -82.9% $2.44 +425.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RLGT vs SGLY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RLGT vs SGLY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RLGT scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs SGLY's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) and Singularity Future Technology L (SGLY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RLGT currently trades at $8.49 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while SGLY trades at $0.39 with a QOC of 4.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).