RLAY vs SNTI

Relay Therapeutics, Inc. vs Senti Biosciences Holdings, Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

RLAY

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Relay Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$13.90
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

SNTI

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Senti Biosciences Holdings, Inc
Quality
4.1
out of 10
Value Trap
39
LOW
Price
$1.00
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RLAY Fair ValueRLAY Upside SNTI Fair ValueSNTI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.06 -63.6% $0.52 -48.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $7.19 -52.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $3.96 -71.5% $0.06 -93.6%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RLAY vs SNTI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RLAY vs SNTI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RLAY scores higher with a 6.0/10 quality rating vs SNTI's 4.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Relay Therapeutics, Inc. (RLAY) and Senti Biosciences Holdings, Inc (SNTI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RLAY currently trades at $13.90 with a QOC of 6.0/10, while SNTI trades at $1.00 with a QOC of 4.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).