Quick Summary — RJF scores higher on quality with 8.9/10 vs RLTY's 1.7/10. RJF trades at $146.75 while RLTY trades at $15.49. Both analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR data across 13 institutional models.
RJF scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs RLTY's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.
At $146.75, RJF trades +64.6% below its Bayesian DCF fair value of $241.51, while RLTY at $15.49 trades +74.0% above its estimate of $4.03. RLTY shows a wider gap between price and intrinsic value.
RJF earns a Quality of Company score of 8.9/10 compared to RLTY's 1.7/10. This is a significant quality gap — the higher-scoring company demonstrates materially stronger fundamentals across profitability, growth consistency, and balance sheet health. The QOC score synthesizes 32 signals spanning profitability margins, revenue growth, free cash flow, capital allocation, and leverage.
Review the value trap analysis for both RJF and RLTY to assess whether apparent undervaluation reflects genuine opportunity or hidden fundamental risk.
Both RJF and RLTY operate in Asset Management, which has 448 stocks tracked by CirclFi. Same-industry comparisons provide the most direct insight into relative valuation since both companies face similar regulatory environments, market dynamics, and competitive pressures. Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN), and ensemble methods (CUCE).
11 hidden models compare RJF vs RLTY differently — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more. Some may disagree with the 2 you see above.
Bloomberg Terminal: ~$2,000/mo · FactSet: ~$1,000/mo · CirclFi: $0.90/day
See All 13 Models — $0.90/dayWe don’t predict prices. We show you what 13 independent mathematical frameworks say a stock is worth — and let you decide.