RILYT vs STEP

BRC Group Holdings, Inc. - 6.00 vs StepStone Group Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

RILYT

Investment Advice
BRC Group Holdings, Inc. - 6.00
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
42
WARN
Price
$21.09
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

STEP

Investment Advice
StepStone Group Inc.
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
51
WARN
Price
$49.31
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RILYT Fair ValueRILYT Upside STEP Fair ValueSTEP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $17.24 -65.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $25.49 +25.9% $34.83 -34.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $6.26 -69.1% $19.81 -61.8%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RILYT vs STEP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RILYT vs STEP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

STEP scores higher with a 5.7/10 quality rating vs RILYT's 5.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing BRC Group Holdings, Inc. - 6.00 (RILYT) and StepStone Group Inc. (STEP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RILYT currently trades at $21.09 with a QOC of 5.3/10, while STEP trades at $49.31 with a QOC of 5.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).