REPL vs RGEN

Replimune Group, Inc. vs Repligen Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

REPL

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Replimune Group, Inc.
Quality
4.4
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$8.69
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

RGEN

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Repligen Corporation
Quality
7.5
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$123.95
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType REPL Fair ValueREPL Upside RGEN Fair ValueRGEN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.76 -79.8% $41.23 -66.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.32 -91.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $2.22 -74.5% $44.04 -64.5%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for REPL vs RGEN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

REPL vs RGEN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RGEN scores higher with a 7.5/10 quality rating vs REPL's 4.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL) and Repligen Corporation (RGEN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

REPL currently trades at $8.69 with a QOC of 4.4/10, while RGEN trades at $123.95 with a QOC of 7.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).