RDZN vs WTW

Roadzen, Inc. vs Willis Towers Watson Public Lim — Valuation Comparison 2026

RDZN

Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service
Roadzen, Inc.
Quality
4.2
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$1.88
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

WTW

Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service
Willis Towers Watson Public Lim
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$249.67
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RDZN Fair ValueRDZN Upside WTW Fair ValueWTW Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.33 -82.6% $55.20 -77.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $80.25 -67.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $2.22 +18.1% $396.29 +58.7%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RDZN vs WTW — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RDZN vs WTW — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WTW scores higher with a 5.3/10 quality rating vs RDZN's 4.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Roadzen, Inc. (RDZN) and Willis Towers Watson Public Lim (WTW) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RDZN currently trades at $1.88 with a QOC of 4.2/10, while WTW trades at $249.67 with a QOC of 5.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).