RCUS vs RFL

Arcus Biosciences, Inc. vs Rafael Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

RCUS

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$25.34
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

RFL

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Rafael Holdings, Inc.
Quality
4.5
out of 10
Value Trap
66
DANGER
Price
$1.37
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RCUS Fair ValueRCUS Upside RFL Fair ValueRFL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.30 -79.1% $0.50 -63.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $12.78 -49.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $7.14 -71.8% $1.80 +31.1%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RCUS vs RFL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RCUS vs RFL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RCUS scores higher with a 6.4/10 quality rating vs RFL's 4.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) and Rafael Holdings, Inc. (RFL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RCUS currently trades at $25.34 with a QOC of 6.4/10, while RFL trades at $1.37 with a QOC of 4.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).