RAAQ vs RANG

Real Asset Acquisition Corp. vs Range Capital Acquisition Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

RAAQ

Blank Checks
Real Asset Acquisition Corp.
Quality
5.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.35
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

RANG

Blank Checks
Range Capital Acquisition Corp.
Quality
4.4
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$10.61
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RAAQ Fair ValueRAAQ Upside RANG Fair ValueRANG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.30 -97.4% $0.95 -91.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.84 -92.4% $5.45 -48.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RAAQ vs RANG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RAAQ vs RANG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RAAQ scores higher with a 5.0/10 quality rating vs RANG's 4.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Real Asset Acquisition Corp. (RAAQ) and Range Capital Acquisition Corp. (RANG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RAAQ currently trades at $11.35 with a QOC of 5.0/10, while RANG trades at $10.61 with a QOC of 4.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).